>
 
Freedom the only End
 
  Theft

Taxation is theft. This story is as old as taxation. It is simple, if you take something from a person that does not belong to you then you are stealing. How many have actually signed away their “gift” to the public service and the politicians?
Man precedes government and therefore has superior rights. But if government is a natural progression in our society there must be a source of revenue that does not break the basic tenets of law. “Thou shalt not steal” applies to government as well as the people.
Land Value is the people’s value. It is the measure of societies demand for a particular site and a measure of the services, provided to that site, by both people as individuals and by society as a whole. The greater the services, and demand, and popularity of a given site the greater the value of that site. That value has nothing to do with the ownership, it is purely created by demand outside the control of the owner. It is reasonable to say that this value is truly a public value and can be harvested legitimately* by society for its use.
The collection of this value would remove from government the perennial accusation of being robbers. It would bring about a better use of land and give a greater number of people access to the land and to the development of that land.
This is a far cry from current taxation which penalises each and every activity in the production process. Effectively a brake upon production; a penalty for working. The acceptance of this type of taxation is widespread. As the propaganda goes “death and taxes are always with us.” We are working hard on the former so why not on the latter? Here we must recognise that the most sensitive nerve in the human body is the one that carries the wallet.
Advocacy of taxation to achieve certain political aims does not help in the seeking of justice. A tax on Payrolls has the effect of reducing the payroll, especially in those borderline areas, and therefore retards progress. Parking fees and “congestion” charges fall into this category. They effectively reduce the value of a given site or area by restricting the people who can afford to visit that location. The Leichhardt & Waverly city councils (NSW) have tentitavely removed parking restriction for 15 minute periods on the cities main roads. The shopkeepers and shoppers are ecstatic. In Melbourne the city council introduced parking restriction in Lygon St., and have raised the ire of shopkeeper and motorist alike. Basically these fees are simply a tax, similar to a tariff, and the destructive content of that imposition is evident to all. It is trying to do by force what should happen naturally.
The collection of the site rent (land value) for all land would alleviate this problem, ensuring that the rewards of societies activities was not reaped by the private landowner come shopkeeper. Then the congestion would not occur. This is the most basic aspect of the collection of site rent (land value). It would distribute the activities further across the community, relieving the producer (in this case the shopkeeper) from onerous taxation, and enable more people (motorists?) access without causing distress to others.
*This is a reference to moral law not Statutory law.
 
 

Environment
The Environment movement is getting quite a name for itself. Particularly in that it will not have any opposition to its ideas. Opposing environmentalists is akin to opposing government. You will laughed at, ridiculed, maligned and villified. Questioning the validity of their arguments is the greatest sin since Moses broke the tablets. For the other side of the story watch ABC television “The Great Global Warming Swindle” 8:30pm Thursday, 12 July 2007

Once again the story of the environmental movement is one of applying political force and punitive taxation procedures to what should be a simple matter of stewardship. The motives and outlook of these people should be closely examined. They bear strong relationship to the looney left in their political outlook. Certainly what they espouse is pure socialist policy; put in its simplest terms they advocate the state control not only of what industry does but what you, the producer and consumer, will spend your money on; don’t use too much electricity we don’t approve, don’t use too much water, we don’t approve; you should and must do this or that. Lenin never had so much support. The argument they put forward is spurious and peppered with sophistry. Environmentalists are firmly on the left of the political scene, their motivation is clearly singular - legislative control of everything ie. Socialism.

 
 

Freedom.

When he spoke the words opposite the author must have had high hopes. Today, with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the use of “Terrorism” to put fear into people, the open threats to Russia by the Americans building missile bases and ever more powerful government it is reasonable to cry “Liberty Where are you?” Government has thrust its nose into every part of our lives. Britain, one of the most advanced countries for civil liberty has, under a Thatcher look alike called Blair, invoked some of the most draconian legislation ever produced - against its own citizens. Whatever happened to the Monarch? What has happened to the English speaking world?
The Americans have thrown out the ever lauded Bill Of Rights. Policemen shoot whoever gets in their way, poverty is rife and a person illegally in the office of president laughs all the way to the banks of his cronies. There is Guantanamo in violation of all that is human and the CIA, trained originally by Gestapo officers, has secret (from the people not the peoples governments) prisons around the world.
Capitalism is proving it is a greater and more terrible master than ever communism was. At least with communism you knew your enemy was the state. With capitalism its not only the state but every rabbiting little News Corp paper that pushes its own barrow to the enhancement of its profits and to hell with the welfare and freedom of the people.
In our own country the prospective national leader has a unionist thrown out of the “labor” party because he used unapproved tactics to get wage rises. What the hell does he think happens at board meetings? Perhaps he thinks they discuss, like gentlemen, the “poor” tactics and productivity of their workers and how to give them more wages!
The environmental lobby is blaming everyone for what they perceive to be the state of the planet. They object to the normal activities of the people in simply going about their daily lives. “How dare you use electricity or water or anything else for that matter, look at the waste.” These intellectual morons have created such a climate of fear among people that even the capitalists have jumped on the bandwagon. More profits! Look how good we are! We don’t like Global Warming. We shall have to charge more! The environmental lobby is all cant. They have investigated no further than their noses. The root cause of the problems lie in the land question. And whilst they do nothing to alter this basic violation of humanity they will only be playing into the hands of the profiteers they hate so much. Global Warming is a natural phenomena, there may be things we can do to counteract it. Those things have nothing to do with screwing the people into the ground. The saddest part is that whilst these “environmentalists” are socialist in thought, their actions will harm the poorer people in the community not the wealthier. This is typical of the socialist breed. They should remember that it is poverty that is the enemy. Creating poverty is so much a socialist event, they must have copied it from capitalism. The plan should be to make everyone wealthy. So where are we being led to? The propaganda says that Putins Russia is bad. Have you looked at Australia lately?
The theme of this paper is “Freedom, the only end.” Georges’ theme all those years ago was “Liberty shall we not trust her?” What is being presented to us is anything but freedom or liberty. Power play and corruption are everywhere - you and I are the pawns. Let’s put a stop to it.

 
 

We Work For Wages

Work, a four letter word in the English language, is with us for most, if not all, of our lives. If you want to eat you need to work to get “money” so that you can purchase the food. If you want clothes you need to work so that you can get “money” so you can purchase the clothes. If you want a roof over your head, in the form of a house, you can rent one with the “money” you earn when you work. If you want to buy that, or any other, house, you hock your living for a third of your lifetime to afford the mortgage. When you have paid the mortgage, through working, you will own the house, not before. The “money” you earn is of course your wages. Whilst a few people may get income from sources other than wages, this for the majority is the only source of income.
Even the most primitive of men had to work for a living. Whether you hunted for meat, fished or grew crops, all entailed work which resulted in a wage. Of course the primitive man received his wages in the form of what he pursued. The hunter meat, which could be traded for fish and veggies, the fisherman made his own boat, ate fish and traded with the hunter for the skins to make clothes, so with the farmer’s crops. In its simpler forms it is easy to see that what man works for, his wealth is his wages. And all that he earns is his wages. His capital equipment is minimal, consisting of bow and arrows or a lance, a line for the fisherman which he made himself and his one man boat which he also made himself. The farmer needs seed and most likely collected it himself and sewed and cared for the crops which were his wages.
Today we even things out by using “money” to measure the value of everything including our work. It is quite easy to exchange the “money” we earn for those commodities we wish to purchase.
Wages are what we work for. Whether your job is collecting garbage, serving in a restaurant, driving a train, bricklaying, running a large company or being a public servant, the objective is wages. The higher the wages the better off we are in what we can afford for food, clothing, and shelter, and the other things, purchasable, with those wages. Any effort to reduce wages, the general ploy of Employers Associations and Chambers of Commerce, (Trades Unions by another name) can only have limited effect. That is, unless there is a pool of labour, called the unemployed, from which to draw. (This makes current government figures somewhat suspect.) For when there is a demand for labour that exceeds the supply wages will always rise until the demand is met.
In a society, like ours, which is rich in Capital (stored up labour) the production processes are simplified. Machines do much of the hard work. We no longer dig ditches by hand, ride the plough behind a horse, or row the boat out to sea to catch fish. It is all mechanised. But we still need wages. Trades Unions are formed to get the highest wages for their members and as such employ people with the knowledge to tackle the bigger employers who in turn use lawyers and politicians to achieve their ends. It is worth remembering that the employer himself also works for wages. And whilst his income may come from other sources, (these may be from rent for land or interest on capital) he too is a labourer for wages. So anything which reduces, or tends to reduce, wages is something that acts against the whole of society. Such things as the Good and Services Tax (GST), Income tax, Excise Duties, Tariffs, are all means of controlling where wages are spent, and have to be adjusted to account for these impositions. It is perhaps a little recognised feature of our taxation system that the poorer you are (less wages) the greater the impact of taxation upon you. The greater your income, from wages and other sources, the greater the opportunity for writing off “expenses” in getting that income and therefore reducing the tax burden. This is not to be condemned. It shows the injustice of the system. It favours some and damns others. A GST bears heavily on those with the least wages and favours those on the greater income. There is something wrong with the whole system of taxation because it relies upon people working and getting wages and then penalises them for that work.
Working for wages is an honourable way of earning a living. We may remember that there are three great orders of society; Workingmen, Beggarmen, and Thieves.

 
  Inflation: a spectre of the past?
We have all heard of the subject. Newspapers have written reams about the subject. Economist have written volumes (all different, of course) about the dreaded inflation. And now, in 2008, we are faced with the problem again.
There are few things to remember when discussing anything to do with economics. The subject refers to the most sensitive of human nerves, the hip pocket. So prejudice, ignorance and bigotry rule the day. Politics also aims to control economics. Wherever politics are involved one can expect lies, lies, obscurantism, abuse, more lies; you should know the story by now. Formidable forces to get around!
History is a wonderful subject; things which bother us today are often (not always) things which bothered our ancestors and often (not always) they found a solution to. So how far back into history does inflation go?
There was a Greek gentleman named Archimedes who was given a job by King Heiron II. The king thought he was being ripped off. His crown was supposed to be pure gold. He did not think it was. The job was to find out whether it was or was not. We all know the story of “Eureka!” Archimedes found out how to determine whether it was pure or adulterated. That was 2200 years ago. But how do you tell if a currency is adulterated? That something of lower value has been added to the good stuff? Who would or could do such a thing?
All currency in Australia is a matter for the Federal Government. They design it and they issue it. The intrinsic value of the currency is nil. Those plastic notes we have in our wallets cost mere cents to produce and is only representative money. If the government went broke so would we. Such a system is easily abused and difficult to control because the people do not have any recourse but to use what the government determines is currency.
So when you read in newspapers that the government is “awash with money” maybe it would be prudent to ask where they got it from? There are only two sources. Via taxation from the people or they printed some extra copies when they ran the presses. There are of course references to this in the Parliamentary records here in Australia, the UK and the USA, and probably many other countries. Effectively, when prices rise, as they are doing in Australia, as a general event, then the currency is being inflated. That is, the government is expanding its means of taxation. Those most affected are those on fixed incomes and living from savings and next are those struggling to keep their wages realistic. If we were able to freely convert to, and use, gold as currency this could not occur. But when politicians talk about free markets they do not appear to include its use for the common man, only their business friends.
Trust money is never good. Trust money in the hands of government is an oxymoron. We should do something about it. Exchangeability would be a good start.